Is the Goldman Sachs valuation of $50Bn for Facebook reasonable? Here is what we know about Facebook:
- > 500 Mio active users
- 50% of active users log on to Facebook in any given day
- The average user has 130 friends
- People spend 700 billion minutes per month on Facebook
Sanity check:
According to the Goldman Sachs valuation
- each active user is worth $100
- Considering a lifetime of Facebook of T years*
- for T=1: one useryear is worth $100
- for T=5: one useryear is worth $20
- for T=10: one useryear is worth $10
- each minute/month spent on Facebook is worth 50/700 = $0.0714
- Considering a lifetime of Facebook of T years*
- for T=1: each minute is worth $0.0059
- for T=5: each minute is worth $0.0012
- for T=10: each minute is worth $0.0006
Let’s say, Facebook will be around for another 10 years with a stable user base. Is it reasonable to spend $10 per useryear, or 0.06 cents per userminute, respectively?
What are major sources of Facebook’s revenue?
- Facebook made $2Bn revenue in 2010
- 1 trillion display ads/year
- Facebook gets 30% of third party revenues via Facebook Credits
- Facebook game giant Zynga made $500-$800M revenue in 2010
Crunching numbers:
- 8 minutes spent on Facebook equals 1 ad impression
- Every year, the average user consumes 2000 ad impressions via Facebook
- The current CPM for Facebook ads is max $2 (1tr * $2/1000 = $2Bn)
- Considering a reasonable average CPM of $3, this makes a potential future revenue of $6 per user per year
- Every year, the average user spends $1-$1.6 on Zynga’s virtual goods and ads, out of which Facebook gets $0.3-$0.5
This rough calculation shows that Goldman might actually be right with their Facebook valuation. Time will show.
Advertisement
January 19, 2011 at 4:55 pm |
Overrated. I’d go short.